Slumdog Millionaire (2008)

I did speak too soon on my Curious Case of Benjamin Button review. This, right here, is the Best Picture winner. Tomorrow, Slumdog Millionaire will become an underdog story at the Oscars. Buzzy and a great director, Slumdog had everything going for it. Now it can finally claim what it rightfully needs: Oscars.

Slumdog Millionaire is the story of Jamal Malik (Dev Patel of Britain's Skins), a man currently in the hot seat of the Indian version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?. He gets to the second to last question and the authorities think he is cheating and take him into prison. There, they tell about the show and he tells of his life in the slums of Mumbai and the love of his life, Letika.

Danny Boyle's direction is just stunning, as usual. The film is very artistic, employing all kinds of direction techniques. The scene in which the children run away from evil authorities is very well shot. It is a frenzied scene of children jumping across rooftops and hiding behind curtains. Many directors could shoot the scene well, but the best would have been the version that came in the form of this film.

The film has only one flaw. The problem that I had with the film was the predictability of it. You can tell where the film is going to go right from the start. Even scene that are supposed to make you think something else didn't deceive me. Although, I suppose there is nothing you can do about it considering that the writers adapted it from the book Q & A.

Slumdog Millionaire is the second best film of 2008. Sorry, I still love The Dark Knight. Still, it really is a very bittersweet movie with tons of acclaim and a great soundtrack. It is a hip, cool look at the bad parts of India and the corruption of authorities. The sweet tale of Jamal is sure to charm anyone who watches it.

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974)

Seeing as this long forgotten classic is being remade, I thought I would see what it is all about. The Taking of Pelham One Two Three is a fun thriller. It is not something that is easy to forget, but somehow it has become that way. I can't really give an explanation for it.

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three is about a group of men named after colors boarding a subway car. They get on the train and hold it up with a ransom of a million dollars (and that was back in '74!). If their demands aren't met by the state of New York in an hour, they will kill one passenger per minute.

It really doesn't surprise me at all that somebody wants to remake it. It is a flawed movie. This has become even more flawed over the course of time because it is so dated. Still, old movies should never be touched. Then again, maybe this one does need the Denzel Washington/John Travolta/Jason Statham casting it recently got.

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three is very fun and I really do love the end. To tell what happens would completely ruin it, so I'll let you find out for yourself. The beginning is slow and well paced, but the end moves extremely fast. The film comes out to be a classic...a forgotten classic.

Book vs. Movie

Little Children vs. Little Children
The Explanation: Both are great. The acting in the movie is something the book can't do, obviously, but the book is way funnier than the movie. On the other hand, the movie cuts a lot of the flashbacks in the book which makes the movie slightly better.
The Verdict: The movie.

The Ring vs. Ring
The Explanation: This is almost hard to do. Again, both are very good, but they are completely different. The Japanese version is more faithful to the book, but Verbinski's version is scary and satisfying.
The Verdict: Both.

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button vs. the short story
The Explanation: As expected, F. Scott Fitzgerald's short story is great. It, unlike the movie, is satirical and funny rather than melodramatic. The movie is sentimental and long, but still find a place in my heart that the book doesn't. Also, the makeup is just fantastic.
The Verdict: The movie.

The Ruins vs. the book
The Explanation: The movie may have been bashed by critics, but it really wasn't that bad. I was entertained and I had fun. The movie was pretty faithful to Scott Smith's book. The main difference is that I didn't found the movie very creepy. The book was so scary I found that I couldn't read it before I went to bed like I usually do.
The Verdict: The book wins by a mile

"True Blood": Season 1 vs. Dead Until Dark
The Explanation: The sexed up series is a wild ride that the books just don't do for me. Yes, the books are funny, but they just don't do the same thing the series does for me. Both move at a really fast pace. The book cuts many of the sex scenes which may or may not be better depending on what you're looking for.
The Verdict: The series

Movies You Shouldn't See: Meet the Spartans (2008)

Meet the Spartans was once called Epic Movie 2. They cleverly disguised this film as Meet the Spartans because the writers were so ashamed of having written such an awful movie. The disguise didn't work. Meet the Spartans is just another awful spoof. Again, the first few times it was funny, but it has lost its charm.

Meet the Spartans is a spoof of 300, Transformers, Stomp the Yard, Grand Theft Auto, Ugly Betty, American Idol, and all other American entertainment things. It provides an even less funny outlook on action movies than ever before. Carmen Electra has been cast in a leading role if that tells you enough.

Although this may be a horrible movie, it has been a bit overcriticized. I would like to say that the Dane Cook impression was actually funny, but the rest of the movie just seems to weight it down. Come on. You made fun of Nicole Richie by making her look like the Hunchback of Notre Dame. Not funny!

What else is there to say about the movie? I have already criticized the awful nature of this movie enough for your likings. 300 is now not as good as it was the first time. Poor Carmen Electra. Why did you take their offer? I am not even going to go into how stupid the American Idol bashing is. For shame, Aaron Seltzer and your other six or however many writers, for shame!

Coraline (2009)

In 2002, I discovered the cunning and creepy book Coraline by Neil Gaiman. Even as an adult, I was completely scared by the book. Just this Friday, the film version was released in theaters. The film version is on par with the book in its excellence. In 3D, the movie is an amazing, fun-filled experience.

Coraline is about a little girl (voiced by Dakota Fanning) who moves to a new house. She hates her parents who refuse to pay attention to her and is completely bored by her new surroundings. One day, she stumbles upon a portal. Everything seems the same except that the people have button eyes. What she didn't know was that her other mother (voiced by Teri Hatcher) has other evil means for her.

In 3D, the film is absolutely beautiful. If you ever have seen a film shown in REAL-D technology, you know what it is like, but for those who don't, it is like real life. The movie honestly looks like there are drawn out actors right in front of your eyes. Seeing this makes me regret my decision not to see My Bloody Valentine in 3D, but from the looks of it, Monsters Vs. Aliens and Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs look promising in 3D.

Aside from all that, the stop motion animation is great. It is hard to believe this wasn't done on the computer. That's just how good it is. Henry Selick, the man behind The Nightmare Before Christmas (and not Tim Burton contrary to belief), manages to scare the audience with this without even breaking a sweat. Also, the animation looks even better in 3D.

If you haven't figured it out yet, see the film if possible in 3D. If not, the film is amazing as well in 2D. Neil Gaiman's book has gotten a great adaptation for the screen. It has in no way lost its creepiness and intrigue. Coraline will definitely follow in the tracks of Corpse Bride and The Nightmare Before Christmas by becoming a cult classic and selling clothes at Hot Topic.

Perspolis (2007)

Persepolis, an often banned book, has made its way to the big screen in a powerful way. The film carries all the artistic elements from the book. The viewer easily relates to our main character and we become completely engrossed in the movie.

Persepolis is autobiographical story of the author of the book, Marjane Satrapi. Chiara Mastroianni voices her as a girl living in Tehran during the turbulent 80's. Marjane quickly realizes what is going on around her and tries to participate in the revolution. Through this, she realizes the struggles in life and love.

The movie is flawless aside from one thing, the fact that they barely changed the graphic novel. Though it may be artistic and great, why make an animated movie out of an already drawn book? Still, it is very interesting and quite well done. I can't deny it.

Persepolis is gripping and powerful. The animation is great and a treat to watch. The stark black and white contrasts well with the few scenes in color. The movie's acting and message are excellent. Though not much work may have been done to adapt the graphic novel, it still winds up being great.

Pulp Fiction (1994)

It isn't just the ODs, royales with cheese, or other quotes that make this film great. Pulp Fiction is what it is and there simply isn't a better way to put it. Every single thing in the movie makes it great and I'm not really sure how else to put it. The acting, Quentin Tarantino, the amount of times the word "fuck" is said (I think it was over 300). It is all so memorable and that is why Pulp Fiction remains a pop culture icon.

It really isn't easy to sum up the movie in a paragraph, but here it goes. A couple at a diner, two hit men (John Travolta and Samuel L. Jackson), a boxer (Bruce Willis), and a gangster's wife (Uma Thurman) lives all intertwine. The tales come together in unusual ways. The film follows a non-linear timeline. Other cast members include Tim Roth, Ving Rhames, Eric Stolz, and Rosanna Arquette.

The film has so many memorable scenes, but the overdose is my favorite. When the characters are forced to save a woman who has overdosed on cocaine, movie magic occurs. Maybe it's the acting, I don't know why, but it is just so great. Also, Travolta and Jackson's conversation about burgers is just so great. Another great scene is when a car goes over a bump and Jackson accidentally shoots a man and his brains blow all over him.

There isn't more to say than just go watch it. Pulp Fiction is a milestone in movie history and deserves to be watched by everyone. It may not be a film for everybody, but still, it is one of the best films of all time. If you have never understood what somebody was quoting, this movie was probably it. Go watch it! Now!

Pineapple Express (2008)

Though every comedy seems to boast "From the writers of Superbad", this one has the right to do so. Pineapple Express is fine and shockingly violent comedy. As opposed to other Seth Rogen works, this one is actually aimed at viewers with a refined movie taste. Though it may also may be aimed at pot smokers, you do NOT have to be one to see it and enjoy it.

Pineapple Express is the quirky story of a man (Seth Rogen) and his dealer (James Franco in a Golden Globe nominated role). After he sees a man get shot while he is high, he runs to his dealer and go on the run. Little do they know that the murderer and a corrupt policewoman are hot on their trailer. Indie auteur David Gordon Green directs.

Again, why is this film so smart? It really is the script that makes it work. Though it is an absolutely ridiculous and overly long movie, it still is a gem. It may be violent and not for everyone, but still how could anyone not laugh at the car chase scene? The whole kicking the foot through the window bit is one of the funniest I have ever seen. Also the cross joint is hilarious and wild.

If the tagline "One hit can ruin your whole day." wasn't good enough, the first fifteen minutes are sure to bring anyone who watches it under its spell. Though I will admit it could have been cut slightly, it does manage to make you laugh and that is the point of it. Seth Rogen has done another great job. My next Netflix rental will be Zack and Miri Make a Porno so we'll see if he's any good in it.

Tropic Thunder (2008)

The second smart comedy of 2008 is Tropic Thunder. Tropic Thunder is actually not smart at all, but it is a fine parody of war films such as Platoon and Apocalypse Now. Add some great acting and a clever script together and you get the nice surprise that Tropic Thunder is. Clever and stupid all at once, the movie is easily quotable and very fun.

The movie, as I have said before, is one long parody of the war film genre. It is about actors on the set of a movie who can't seem to work towards any progress in the movie. Among the many stars in the movie, there's Jack Black, Ben Stiller, and Robert Downey Jr. The director decides to get realistic war footage so he puts the actors in a climate the aren't used to: actual war. There are many cameos including Nick Nolte as a war veteran and Tom Cruise as a ruthless Hollywood agent.

Though even the credits seem like a joke, the movie was nearly completely made by actors. Ben Stiller does quadruple duty by acting, directing, producing, and writing the film. It's obvious that he wrote the script because it is so kooky and obnoxious (but also enjoyable) at times. What isn't quite as obvious is that movie star Justin Theroux also helped write the script. Also, the cast is quite good. Robert Downey Jr. is great as a black man and was nominated for an Oscar as a result of his performance. He won't win it, IMHO, because he is up against Heath Ledger.

Tropic Thunder is a comedy that should stick with American audiences for a while. The movie is offensive and never dull, typical characteristics of any Ben Stiller or Jack Black movie. Though I can't stand either actor, they are actually quite enjoyable. The rest of the cast isn't too shabby either. The fake trailers in the beginning are simply a nice finishing touch on an already golden movie.

Forgetting Sarah Marshall (2008)

Forgetting Sarah Marshall is one of three great comedies of 2008. Unlike many of its genre, it is smart and hilarious. The acting is great and really fun to watch. Though it may be fluff, it still is quite funny and a great popcorn flick.

Peter (Jason Segel) is a musician happily going out with Sarah Marshall (Kristen Bell), an actor on the craptastic parody of CSI. Sarah breaks up with him over the reason that she has found a new boyfriend played by Russell Brand. Her new boyfriend is a sleazy rocker. Peter's brother suggests he take a vacation to Hawaii to get over the break up. Peter goes and there he meets Sarah again.

The movie's smaller roles are also what make it great. Mila Kunis plays an amiable love interest of Peter's. At times, she is cute and at other times, she is raunchy and hilarious. Bill Hader as Peter's brother is great. Jonah Hill of Superbad fame also plays a waiter at a resturaunt. My personal favorite is Jack McBrayer (30 Rock) as a Jesus loving man conflicted about sex with his wife.

The film is famous for its (ahem) full fronal scenes from Jason Segel. Are the necessary? Not really, but are the funny? Certainly. When asked about why he included them he said "Penises are funny". Apparently, that is true.

Forgetting Sarah Marshall is a movie that will be forgotten, unfortunately. For the next few years, it will retain its popularity, but I don't think it will stand the test of time. Still, the actors are enjoyable as well as the jokes. Smart and funny are two things that don't usually mix, but here they do exceptionally well.

Vicky Cristina Barcelona (2008)

Even though the title may just be the worst one in history, Woody Allen's Vicky Cristina Barcelona is funny and charming. Though not hilarious as Allen had wished, it still is visually stunning and well acted. The film makes you feel as though you actually went to Barcelona for two hours.

Rebecca Hall plays Vicky and Scarlett Johansson plays Cristina, two girlfriends who take a trip to Barcelona for the summer hence the title. There they meet the elusive Juan Antonio (Javier Bardem), a nice artist. They both fall in love with him. The love triangle becomes some other quadrilateral when Maria Elena (Penelope Cruz), a previous girlfriend of Juan Antonio, comes back to see him. And that's not even the end of it.

Penelope Cruz's acting is the best part of this film. She gives a really great performance. There aren't many actresses who can give a real tour de force performance like she can. Though the other actresses and Javier Bardem come off as a bit dry, Cruz really shines and well deserves her Oscar nomination and Golden Globe.

As I mentioned before, the film is beautiful. Though it is probably very hard to make Barcelona look ugly, when you add Woody Allen into the equation, the filmmaking reaches a new level. As Juan Antonio and the women walk around Barcelona, the viewer becomes so amazed by the sights they see. This movie actually inspired me to travel to Barcelona next summer.

Vicky Cristina Barcelona's humor may be strange, but it still is very lovable. This is one of 2008's good movies. Somewhere in the middle, the film begins to feel a bit long, but the resolution makes it better. A weird lesbian scene and great acting, this film has it all. Woody Allen has directed another good one.

Movies You Shouldn't See: Saw II (2005)

The first Saw was good, why ruin it with a sequel? Well, they did with four more (a sixth is in the making). I guess the writers decided they could just miss an NC-17 rating several more times. Saw II seems so familiar...in a bad way. Though the story has a few good twists, the bloody traps don't hold my attention as long as they should.

This time, Jigsaw is back to his perverted ways. He locks a bunch of criminals in a broken down house, but then again, why would they ever make the conditions clean? Anyway, they have to go through a series of traps in a certain amount of time in order to make it out alive without breathing in too much nerve gas. Did I mention that there's blood?

As the Saw series seems to indicate, violence is something people like to see. I never did understand why, but this movie should be no exception. One trap involves a man looking through a keyhole. When he pulls the door a little, a shotgun goes off and blows his brains out. Isn't it great that this is what our children are watching?

Other than the sadism, the movie also has godawful acting. Honestly, I would consider closing down the colleges where the actors in this went to. Every actor gives a tour de farce performance. You could have at least made an attempt to look like you were scared!

The Saw series does never end. Even after Jigsaw (SPOILERS) dies (END SPOILERS) in the third one, the series still isn't over. The second is a lead up to the even worse third one and it just seems to just go downhill from there. I'll admit, watching them once in a while with friends isn't a bad experience. Still, if you are alone and considering watching this, don't.

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

No, we may be in 2009 and not have HALs yet, but still 2001: A Space Odyssey is a cinematic feat. Obviously made by Stanley Kubrick, the odd scientific journey through space doesn't even make sense. Still, it is one of the best movies ever. Though I have never read Arthur Clarke's novel, I can assure, it can't be as good as this.

2001 is about a group of people looking to begin a new life in space. Together, with a computer named HAL, they search for a monolith supposedly buried in a planet. Yes, this is the movie with the silent first 30 minutes in which the apes dance around the monolith.

The movie, to say the least, is very Kubrickian. Every single scene can have no meaning at all when looked at on just the surface. Every scene can also be seen as masked with metaphor. Though the movie is definitely hard to decipher, it is worth taking a stab at trying to find its true meaning.

There are certain stretches of the movie that do grow tiresome. People with epilepsy should watch out for the 10 minute long scene in which they travel through deep space. Flashing lights abound, the scene lasts way too long and makes me feel ill. Also, the nonsensical ending is completely open to interpretation which some hate. I am neither here or there on it, but I am certain the book doesn't have the same effect.

2001 is a monolith in and of itself. A masterpiece and a stroke of genius, it is the movie that is complex and perplexes. One of the many beauties of the film is that it makes the viewer think about what Kubrick is trying to say with the surrealistic imagery. Why does he do this? Why is it necessary for us to see this? One may never know, but just like Eyes Wide Shut, the film is ambiguous. Kubrick's masterpiece shall live on forever no matter how dated it becomes.

Red Eye (2005)

Here is an example of why Wes Craven can do so much when he uses his skill correctly. Red Eye is taut and crisp clocking in at nearly an hour and a half. The claustrophobic thriller is short and to the point, but still manages to thrill the audience. Rachel McAdams and Cillian Murphy do their parts justice.

Lisa Reisert (Rachel McAdams) is on her way back to the Lux Atlantic Hotel in Miami which she owns. Her flight has been delayed for hours. Finally, she gets on the plane and meets Jackson Rippner (Cillian Murphy)-haha-and gets into a conversation with him. Things turn ugly when he kidnaps her and threatens to kill her father if she doesn't assisst him in killing a powerful politician.

Seeing McAdams' performance makes you wonder why she hasn't been in anything recently minus the flop Married Life. She gives a believable acting job which is often hard to do in an action movie. Cillian Murphy seems to have befallen the same fate. Once the attractive guy in 28 Days Later, he seems to have faded into oblivion and one has to wonder why.

Wes Craven has made a very satisfying thriller. Though it is a crossover for him, he shows that he does know what he is doing. Though the movie gets a bit far fetched towards the end, it really is a fun summer movie. When you combine a good story and Craven, movie magic can happen as we can see here.

Oscar Nominations!

And for the 81st Academy Awards the nominees for best picture are The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Slumdog Millionaire, Milk, The Reader, and Frost/Nixon. Surprise, surprise. I still think Benjamin Button should win, but who knows? All of these are pretty good. It did get 13 nominations. Slumdog Millionaire got 10 and The Dark Knight got 8 which is righteous even if it didn't get a best picture nomination.

Who was snubbed? Revolutionary Road. It got only 3 nominations, but was expected to get many more. Doubt. Supposedly a best picture nominee, it picked up nominations in other categories. Gran Torino. Did it get any nominations?

Who were the surprises? In Bruges. I never thought I'd live to see the day this movie would be nominated for anything special. A really cool movie that got missed by many movie goers. Wanted. 2 nominations? I'm in shock! Tropic Thunder. Robert Downey Jr. is making quite a comeback! Australia. After all the negative reviews, still there is one nomination.

So who will win? I think we can agree that WALL-E will win best animation, Man on Wire will win best documentary, and that Waltz with Bashir will win best foreign film. I don't know about anything else. Is Slumdog Millionaire too buzzy? Is Benjamin Button too mainstream? Is Frost/Nixon too real? Is The Reader too controversial? Is Milk too gay? Find out of February 22nd.

Movies You Shouldn't See: The Last House on the Left (1972)

Cult classic my ass. Wes Craven's trashy first movie is honestly one of the worst movies I have ever seen. The Last House on the Left may be loved by many, but really, it is just a frenzy of violence and disgust. Craven has better movies. Why is this one of people's favorites?

The Last House on the Left is just gross. It is the supposedly true story of a teenage girl who meets up with a friend. On the way to a rock concert, the meet some seemingly friendly drug dealers. They kidnap the girls and both end up dead (one is raped). The drug dealers, looking for shelter during a storm, end up at the girl's parents' house. The film just gets even more nonsensical from there.

The bad acting and direction are understandable. To call Craven out for those two things is not even fair. It was his first movie. I can't be that hard on this movie. I mean, it was quite a feat to show violence that couldn't be shown in theaters. Then again, it is just unforgivably bad.

The problem I have with this film is that it is just absolutely absurd and distasteful. The rape scene isn't even artistic, it just is exactly what it is. The difference between the brutality of this and the brutality of Irreversible is that it isn't even close to artful. Craven learned from his mistakes, thank god, but this is for some reason famous.

The Last House on the Left is finally being remade. Though the trailer doesn't look any better than the original, I fully support it because this is an example of a film that actually needs to be remade. With A Nightmare on Elm Street, Wes Craven redeemed himself. Of course, this is a first film so I wasn't expecting anything good, but I wasn't expecting anything this bad either! Again, cult classic my ass.

Notorious (2009)

Ahhh, the first good movie of 2009. Notorious is a movie that is generic, but still has universal appeal to almost anyone. Though it does seem very one-sided, it does seem to explore most of the 300 pound bulk that the Notorious B.I.G. was. Moving and dramatic, Notorious is one of the better musical biopics out there.

Notorious is the story of the Biggie Smalls. To those of you who aren't familiar with the pop culture icon, the rapper, played by Jamal Woodward, became an instant sensation after signing with Sean 'Puffy' Combs. Not too long after, he became mixed up in the death of Tupac Shakur and eventually, his own life was taken by an unknown shooter in California. Even though he lived to be only 24, he inspired many people and even produced Lil' Kim.

The acting in this movie is spectacular, that is besides the one who plays Puff Daddy. Angela Bassett is quite good as Valleta, B.I.G.'s mother when he was still Chris Wallace. Also, Jamal Woodward does B.I.G. justice. I'm sure he would not be rolling over in his grave after this fine performance. Aside from him, there's also the one who plays the never shy Lil' Kim, whose performance sometimes is dry, but is quite believable in the end.

Even a good movie has some bad things. The biggest problem I had with this one was how generic it was. Every musical biopic seems to have a billion montages, and this one had a few too many. I don't need another one of him performing and signing some women's boobs. Also, the movie just seemed to stretch on and on. Though it was in a compact length of two hours, they could have cut about 20 minutes.

Overall, Notorious is a satisying dramatization of the rapper's life. Though the slogan may be extremely corny, the movie is not. Loaded with swearing and pot smoking, it manages to capture the audience with the reality of the performances. The tearjerker ending is a nice finishing touch to it. The film gives me a pretty good outlook on this year in movies.

Moulin Rouge (2001)

Baz Luhrmann's frenzied Best Picture nominee is one of my favorite musicals. Moulin Rouge is a clever, frenetic mix of dance, romance, and drama. The music, at least for the most part, is not original, but rather an update (actually, quite the opposite) of newer songs. Nicole Kidman and Ewan McGregor are great. Luhrmann being one of my favorite directors, never fails to astound me.

Moulin Rouge is the story of Christian (Ewan McGregor), a young man searching for love in Paris. One day, a bunch of Bohemians literally crashes through his roof and he becomes involved in a play. The lead actress they want is Satine (Nicole Kidman), a seductive dancer at the Moulin Rouge, a famous cabaret. They go there to ask her, but Christian runs into problems when he falls in love with her, but she has already been sold to the Duke even though she loves him back.

The best part of the movie is the first trip to the Moulin Rouge. The energetic scene where the characters sing "Lady Marmalade" as remixed by Christina Aguilera, Lil' Kim, Mya, and Pink is amazing. Watching the update on the Nirvana song "Smells Like Teen Spirit" is fun. It's great to see people dancing to modern music 1900's style. Then again, it's all so Luhrmann-esque.

The characters are also what makes this movie so great. Toulouse Lautrec, played by John Leguizamo, who was the famous poster artist, is beautifully acted. Also, Nicole Kidman is charming as Satine, even when the film turns ugly towards the end. Ewan McGregor is also adorable as the innocent Christian.

Quirky and charming, Moulin Rouge is a stunning classic. Updates on songs and at times corniness, Baz Luhrmann has created a great musical. Though the mood changes a lot in the second hour, it still remains good and touching. I have to say, I'm the first in line when Baz Luhrmann's The Great Gatsby is done!

Pan's Labyrinth (2006)

Pan's Labyrinth is in Spanish, with English subtitles. It is also called El Laberino del Fauno.

There are many fantasies that are so boring, but never before has dream like imagery and the horrors of real life been mixed. Pan's Labyrinth is not a G-rated fantasy as you would have expected. It is a violent R-rated venture into the dark world of Facist Spain in 1944-Guillermo Del Toro style. Fascinating special effects and great acting abound, Pan's Labyrinth is one of those movies you have to see more than once.

Pan's Labyrinth is the dark tale of Ofelia, a girl whose mother has recently married a wicked general. To break away from the harsh realities of the war, she goes to a labyrinth where one night she meets a creature who tells her she is Princess Mohana and must go through three obstacles to regain her royalty. As she completes them, she is forced to deal with the events that surround her as well as the ones inside the labyrinth.

The special effects in this film are outstanding. In the days where mostly everything is done on the computer, many of the effects were done with makeup. The best and finest example of this is the Pale Man, one of Ofelia's obstacles. He is missing eyes and is completely shriveled up. The great thing about it is that is so creepy because it looks so real. For information on how they did it, one should look no further than the excellent documentary on the DVD.

The real triumph here is Guillermo Del Toro's adaptation of the idea of a fairy tale for adults. Violence is blended with fantasy in a surreal and absurd manner. In fact, I'd say that this is the best case of this that I know of. Many of Miyizaki's films utilize this idea, but this shows happiness and sadness as polar opposites which his films fail to do.

Pan's Labyrinth is one of the outstanding films of 2006. It won three Oscars and it rightfully deserved each one. Guillermo Del Toro has produced and excellent fantasy drama that will stay with me for ages. The ending still makes me weep every time I watch it.

Eyes Wide Shut (1999)

Eyes Wide Shut was originally rated NC-17. Therfore, there is an edited R-rated version, but the NC-17 version is recommended for a more realistic experience.

Continuing on with Stanley Kubrick, there's Eyes Wide Shut. The movie is one of the strangest known to mankind. Erotic and suspensful, the director's last film is misunderstood for obvious reasons and not many critics liked it originally. Now, people have looked past the reviews and began to enjoy it.

Eyes Wide Shut starts out as a free form plot, but then finally starts to begin about 40 minutes in. Bill (Tom Cruise) and Alice (Nicole Kidman) are happily married. One night, Alice admits that she had a fantasy about cheating with another man. Bill is thrown into the idea of hatred and decides that he is going to cheat on her. Little does he know that he has just delved into the odd world of secret sexuality in New York.

The film, which was originally rated NC-17, is extremely sexual. After a certain point in the movie, just about every woman is topless or shows a full frontal. Whether this is necessary or not is a common argument, but I personally feel that it is. The film is notable for the scene in which Kidman dances nude to a Chris Isaak song. Also, the orgy scene is beyond wild and seems to stretch on forever. I think it does actually clock in at about 15 minutes all together (the movie is 159 minutes long).

Another thing that stands out for the whole movie is Stanley Kubrick's direction. It is hard to hold an audience for two hours and 40 minutes, but it is even harder to keep the erotic mood of the film for that long. Every scene seems to have this eerie lingering sexuality to it. Not only this, but the shots are also composed very well. Everything is very appealing to the eye.

Stanley Kubrick's final movie is good end to his career. A great director left us with a great fantasy-or nightmare depending on how you look at it. The actors are great, the scenes are too explicit, and the movie is a great mystery. Creepy and satisfying, Eyes Wide Shut is good cult classic.